tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4490888218551680190.post6387598956406406774..comments2008-06-14T08:45:16.624+01:00Comments on The Bibliophilic Blogger: Slightly FoxedNicholas Murrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07189263209323471368nicholasgmurray@googlemail.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4490888218551680190.post-29167821983199591792008-06-14T08:45:00.000+01:002008-06-14T08:45:00.000+01:00Well, I love Slightly Foxed, not least for its pro...Well, I love Slightly Foxed, not least for its production values - beautiful paper and cover! I can understand what Mark says though, but sometimes its nice to read something slightly less critically.Tom Cunliffewww.acommonreader.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4490888218551680190.post-34787134660133026462008-06-12T14:28:00.000+01:002008-06-12T14:28:00.000+01:00Always good to be pointed to an article of yours N...Always good to be pointed to an article of yours Nick, but I must admit I've always found something off-putting about Slightly Foxed. There always seem to be something snobbish about that byline too...<BR/><BR/>Don't get me wrong, this has nothing to do with the writers that SF covers (ReadySteadyBook would be in the front of the queue for "elitism" if that is what I had in mind!) It is more to do with the tone of the whole thing which seems to wallow in a kind of nostalgic bibliophilia which I find difficult to square with engaged, critical reading.Mark Thwaitehttp://www.bookdepository.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4490888218551680190.post-87177461122983643572008-06-12T09:57:00.000+01:002008-06-12T09:57:00.000+01:00Thanks, Chris, for that useful clarification. Pro...Thanks, Chris, for that useful clarification. Promoting reading, particularly amongst those not in the habit of it, is clearly a Good Thing so well done The Reader. I thought I had detected the faintly sickly odour of populism and I am glad to have been proved wrong.Nicholas Murrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07189263209323471368noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4490888218551680190.post-67740250092904102742008-06-12T09:45:00.000+01:002008-06-12T09:45:00.000+01:00Ah, there's a history here. According to the ancie...Ah, there's a history here. According to the ancient myths and stories "The real reader's quarterly ..." sub-heading appeared as a deliberate attempt to distinguish <I>Slightly Foxed</I> from <I>The Reader</I> magazine, which has been around a bit longer. Of course <I>The Reader</I> magazine is just one part of an organisation that does outreach work, literary events--including the 'Shipping Lines' festival in Liverpool this autumn--and research. It promotes reading as a beneficial and worthwhile activity in a variety of contexts, such as prisons, hospitals and so on. So The Reader Organisation as a whole represents readers and reading in ways that a magazine, with a fairly limited constituency, cannot hope to achieve on its own. I hope that helps clear that up--and congratulations to the <I>Slightly Foxed</I> folk on another good-looking issue (I haven't read it yet).Chris Routledgehttp://thereaderonline.co.uknoreply@blogger.com